Tuesday, August 5, 2008

Coaching- What Is It All About?

Leaders are visionaries with a poorly developed sense of fear
and no concept of the odds against them”
~Robert Jarvik


Robert Jarvik, surgeon and inventor of the Jarvik artificial heart, made the above comment about leaders, but I think it’s just as relevant and applicable to the entrepreneurial spirit.
Similar to any career, entrepreneurial endeavors are a journey; you really measure their success or failure at the end, not at the milestones. Like corporate leadership, entrepreneurs can also pursue a very lonely path. I want to explore a concept that has held some cachet in corporate America, but hasn’t gained significant visibility or traction in small business – the concept of executive coaching.
Annika Sorestram, Tiger Woods, Venus Williams; besides being world class athletes, what do they all have in common? They all have a coach. If world class athletes have coaches, why wouldn’t it be appropriate for those in the business world to avail ourselves of coaching?
The issue of coaching is interesting and especially valuable in the context of business. My premise is simple: coaching, properly defined and applied, is a competitive if not essential advantage, especially for those in the small business environment.
The first key differentiation is between “executive” and “personal” or “life” coaches.
A personal or life coach’s role is to help focus on life goals and ambitions, creating appropriate “balance” in your personal life and all related factors. This type of coach serves as an external “conscience,” holding the entrepreneur accountable to execute those things standing between him or her and self-actualization, realizing full potential as a person.
An executive coach’s role is focused on helping to develop or increase skills that make the person more effective in a given job. This includes balancing and integrating personal and professional attributes and considerations, but the focus is to help the client thrive in professional life and maximize effectiveness in the workplace (everything from internal meetings to partner negotiations).
I’m not putting a value judgment on one coach or the other. In fact, there are clearly dimensions that overlap. My focus in this article is on the merits of executive coaching.

The most common reasons organizations hire executive coaches is to strengthen an executive or manager’s skills in one or more of these four areas:
· Handling or managing change
· Working well within a team environment
· Interpersonal relationships
· Developing or enhancing “executive” presence (speaking ability, communications, etc).
You can see in the above target skills determine selecting the right resource and specific coaching plan.

Why Entrepreneurs Need Coaching
Whoever coined the phrase “It’s lonely at the top” must have had the entrepreneur in mind. It doesn’t get any lonelier. Entrepreneurs, as individuals, are the business in many cases. They have direct reports, family, maybe even a board; but there is no “organization” to hire a coach if they need additional resources, or even to require or suggest benefits from coaching. They face the same issue as the “corporate” CEO; however, the entrepreneur often doesn’t have access to the same resources.
I have found most the successful entrepreneurs that I have worked with to have a number of characteristics in common; they are visionary, driven to the point of obsession, have a high need for control, and in business dealings these entrepreneurs may tend to be more loners. They have built the business from the ground up, they made the decisions and founded the key relationships – often alone.
Skills like delegation, collaboration, and process management don’t come naturally to entrepreneurs. They will seek advice from technical advisors such as accountants, attorneys, but many of the business skills learned in corporate America aren’t part of an entrepreneur’s experiential base.
I have seen them struggle with issues such as delegation, staff selection, succession planning, and team or collaborative-based decision-making. Bluntly, many of the “technical” advisors have limited experience outside of their core competency areas. The relationship between entrepreneurs and their clients grows from trust and time, not always broad expertise. I find that their advice tends to be biased from their specific expertise.
I will freely admit my “core competency” is in the management of people. I have designed hundreds of human resource management systems with the elements of hiring, selection, training, performance management, and related skills.

As an entrepreneur and C-level executive, I was also required to broaden my skill set to include other functional skills including marketing, finance, and sales. Given my corporate experience, I’m comfortable reaching out to – and collaborating with – those areas of expertise. This makes me a bit of an anomaly as an entrepreneur and it’s also an attribute. In my capacity as a COO, I orchestrated the disciplines of marketing, finance, IT, and HR into an effective symphony.
As businesses move forward and evolve, an entrepreneur will find that it’s critical to do several things:
· Recognize and link “human” processes and business results.
· Develop and strengthen relationships with the “team”, including succession planning for oneself and other key staff.
· Be able to clearly articulate personal mission and vision, especially as the business grows and becomes less “personal”.
· Create feedback opportunities for staff to discuss their needs and opportunities for development (i.e. their investment in business growth and success).
· Delegate portions of responsibilities to allow a clear view of the “30,000-foot” level and a sharp focus on the long-term success of the business, not the day-to-day.
I also believe that in smaller or closely-held businesses, some of the issues targeted by executive coaches are even more critical. In the small organization every hire is a key hire, every decision is a key decision. A significant erroneous business decision doesn’t mean I don’t get my “bonus,” it means I might lose my life savings and my home. I have found from personal experience the “golden parachute” I have from my business seems a little more like it was constructed from that liner in chewing gum wrappers.
A few significant statistics support the value of coaching:
· A return-on-investment study from Fortune 1000 companies showed an average of a 600% return on the dollars they invested in executive coaching. They saw specific improvements in productivity, quality, organizational strength, and customer satisfaction.
· Another study showed a 529% ROI directly attributable to coaching and other intangible benefits. When they included the savings from decreased turnover the number was 788%.
I don’t know about you, but those are the kind of numbers that get my attention, and that of my bankers and my accountants!
In conclusion, I think the case for executive coaching is pretty clear, as is the issue for hiring the right coach for the individual and the situation. I won’t presume to define the “right” coach, but here are helpful tips:

First, two effective questions entrepreneurs should ask prospective coaches:
· What kinds of clients do you work with effectively?
· What kinds of clients do you not work with effectively?
The second tip I have for entrepreneurs (with apologies to the various entities out there that are “certifying” coaches) is what I and others believe are essential competencies in an effective executive coach:
· They must be competent at coaching and influencing others.
· They must be self-aware, empathetic, excellent listeners, and have the ability and willingness to give candid, balanced feedback in a nonjudgmental or confrontational way.
· They must be trustworthy. An entrepreneur will need to be able to trust the coach with intimate, sensitive information about the business.
· They must have at least a baseline understanding of the business sector and business in general. A coach with no experience in business practices, organizational dynamics, and other business disciplines won’t have a solid foundation from which to work.
· They must have the integrity and strength of character to stand up to a strong-willed entrepreneur, even if it means losing that person’s business.

5 Comments:

Blogger Dr. David Weiman said...

I believe that almost everyone in an executive position would benefit from coaching, although "needing" it is a different question!

The AMA recently published a report of their 2008 study of coaching worldwide (although most of the respondents were from North America).

The findings were, among other things, that coaching is best when

- it's developmentally oriented (as opposed to punitive),

- the coachee can select the coach from a few options, and

- the coaching has clear goals and action steps (as opposed to being vague/open-ended/someone to chat with regularly).

I have used a coach for several years, and having an outside resource has not only been invaluable personally, but financially it's paid for itself over and over again.

I AM an executive coach, and I have found that it's common for people to seek executive coaching when they're facing a major problem to be resolved (or need to change a behavior), but, perhaps, the more effective use of coaching is to get to the next level of one's career.

Unfortunately, the kind of personality that drives one to get to the top may also be the kind of personality that doesn't believe in seeking a coach!

Other great adjuncts to executive coaching are MasterMind groups (formal or informal), peer consultations outside your organization, and mentorship from graybeards who still have something to offer!

Dr. David Weiman
Weiman Consulting
http://www.weimanconsulting.com

August 6, 2008 at 9:30 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Mark, I myself have thought about getting a coach. However when I assessed why I found that it was because the workplace is not providing me with the support/development I need. I then spoke with my boss and the HR department and found I was not the only one. Unfortunately not much changed and so I searched internally for a mentor/coach.

I think coaches can be a great resource to people if the right one is chosen. This means understanding your own personality enough to know where you need support. If the coach is trying to mould you into an image he/she sees then it is a waste. The coach needs to provide that window for introspection and evolution so that you as a person evolve. For me - that's the perfect mentor/coach.

August 7, 2008 at 3:32 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Pure genius can argue against coaching as an attempt to judge and box vision that defies assessment by mere mortals. However, one can argue that Voltaire could've lightened up with a personal coach and Einstein could've used some fashion coaching. The reality is that few in the world are totally autonomous and sustainable in perpetuity at all skill levels.

The catalytic energy and obsession that drive successful executives and entrepreneurs can also be barriers to even remote consideration of coaching. As a consultant working with many small businesses and large corporations, I often see owners and executives in need of coaching. Many of these leaders can simply benefit from polishing the edges of their talent to achieve the next level of success. Some are objective enough to stay ahead of their personal curve with coaching as part of their plan, others are blinded by their innate limitations (that have been masked by momentum or unchallenged by intense competition).

The best examples are people who, at their peak of success, choose to explore coaching as personal and professional development. These progressive individuals don't wait until they're knee-deep in trouble, don't depend on coaching as a solution, and don't engage in a co-dependent relationship. The knowledgeable leader understands the value of coaching, they carefully consider selecting the right coach, and they capitalize on coaching benefits.

Coaching is part of evolution. Unless you believe divine inspiration will drive success, it's not hard to see value in effective coaching as a proven way to help maintain evolution to yield growth and progress.

August 9, 2008 at 12:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When executives decide they need to change something about themselves and recognize that they need the help of a keen observer willing to give fearless feedback and push accountability, then an Executive Coach may be in order.

It is difficult, but not impossible, to find someone inside the organization who will give an executive the unvarnished truth about his or her behavior. Most internal people, quite rightfully, have self and career preservation needs which tend to inhibit their willingness to point out the emperor's lack of skivies.

August 10, 2008 at 12:14 PM  
Blogger Dr. Adrian S Petrescu and many friends said...

A story that comes to mind in this context... one time grading midterm exams on understanding factors of a new/changed vision or paradigm, to my shock I found a graduate student having quoted my own "lecture" with naming "the Y factor" as extremely important...

I have wondered a little what was he talking about and realized it was what I have jokingly called "the _wife_ factor", when I was discussing one of the questions posed in management and leadership alike by/with the classic slow elevator anecdote...

The next puzzle piece is this... in journalism for example the no. 1 filter to be used is one's own professional deontology, just the same as when ensuring ethical standards in virtually every profession...

So the question becomes why can we not simply consider an "alter ego" as the lifelong coach who has (or rather should have) been with us althroughout, ever since Kinder? Often, a spouse can serve as said well trusted sound board, second opinion, devil's advocate, perspective lighthouse, tactical and strategic adviser, facts checker, goal reminder, balance provider etc. all often expected attributes (among many others) of a good coach... that is... if we know to benefit from "the Y factor"... having married the right spouse? priceless anyway... so the relevance of an ROI here? hm... Thank you for the valuable insights,

Dr. Adrian S. Petrescu

September 17, 2008 at 6:57 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home